What is it with Australians and regretting things or feeling remorse. As individuals we are not particularly good at extending - or accepting - apologies. Yet in some form of collective noun - Australians - we seem to continually demand expressions of regret over past behaviours.
This, of course, relates to David Hicks. But it also relates to the "stolen" generation.
What does it mean to apologise? Howard was the first to alert me to the semantic difference between apologising and being sorry. He maintained that saying you were sorry did not imply any responsibility for the circumstances for which you are feeling regret. You are simply sad that this-or-that occurred. Whereas, apologising is an acknowledgement that actions that you took warrant not only your regret but your assurance that they will not happen again.
Howard was a twerp and the fear and panic in his eyes during this conversation and towards the "end" were the equivalent of the Fraser lip.
Jenny Macklin is currently negotiating with representatives of the indigenous peoples for an appropriate wording in line with the "Bringing them Home" report. But everyone seems to be in agreement that the word "sorry" is essential. The media is hounding HIcks for an apology over his part in the death of those who died as a result of terrorism - especially those Australian soldiers who have died in Afghanistan. Yet, as David Marr points out, Hicks was already with the American military by the time the first Australian died.
And to the obverse: we are very good at saying the we are not sorry. Alexander Downer has no regrets about the Australian government's handling of the Hicks case.
Regrets, remorse, sorry, apology - I no longer know what it is that I am saying or feeling.
Spiritus mundi images ... whilst I prune, replant and tender in a cloudless 25C
What does it mean to accept an apology? Just because an apology is offered does not mean that it need be accepted. If an apology is accepted does that mean that the issue is no longer to be mentioned - it is over. If an apology is accepted does that mean that the apologer is forgiven? Can an apology be accepted without forgiveness? Wherewith forgive and forget? Are there issues for which no apology is sufficient?
Like a dog with bone - worried this topic all day
Had lunch with friends out in Seven Hills (calathumpian territory); got breath tested; scrounged yet another plumber's pipe for my arbour; and, am about to go out for the evening. But still it carouses through my pea-brain.
Atonement is the act required of one to give effect to an apology. Maybe not. Take the film based on McEwan's book. I have not read the book but the film really pissed me off. She atoned for her actions by lying; by making up happiness for the couple whom she destroyed. She lied to us and to herself. She lied all the way through - hence the many retakes. She knew an apology was required but that it would be inadequate. She fantasised both the apology and the atonement. Eventually it became difficult to discern what actually happened after that fateful night but I gather they never actually saw each other again and I gather she did not have the guts to front up to them. Hence, a fiction within fiction. Too too tricky ...
Recent Comments